Idea of human rights in constitutional legislation of Russia. The judicial review process. Establishing a certain period of appeal with supervisory complaint and limiting grounds for initiation of proceedings. The functions of the cabinet of Ministers.
При низкой оригинальности работы "Principle res judicata in practice of the European court on human rights and of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation", Вы можете повысить уникальность этой работы до 80-100%
Abstract work PRINCIPLE RES JUDICATA IN PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION The principle res judicata, i.e. respect of the final judgement is one of consequences of the principle of legal definiteness [1]. The principle of legal definiteness assumes stability of legal regulation; participants of legal relations should have an opportunity in reasonable limits to foresee consequences of the behavior and to be confident in invariance of the officially recognized status, rights and duties [2]. In particular the principle of legal definiteness requires that in case when final decision made by court on any question would not be put under doubt [3]. It means that none of the sides should not possess the right to demand revision of final and enforced judgement simply for the purpose of renewal of trial and making the new decision on the case. Powers of higher courts on revision of judgements should be carried out for the purpose of correction of mi
Вы можете ЗАГРУЗИТЬ и ПОВЫСИТЬ уникальность своей работы
