Practical aspects of U.S. security policy from the point of view of their reflection in the "Grand strategy", as well as military-political and military-political doctrines. The hierarchy of strategic documents defining the policy of safety and defense.
Аннотация к работе
Nowadays, Ukraine also has to work out new approaches towards the national security and defense that are driven by current security environment, annexation of Crimea, and military conflict in the Eastern Ukraine sponsored by Russia. Strategy, as it is determined in the US Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, is ТАША prudent idea or set of ideas for employing the instruments of national power in a synchronized and integrated fashion to achieve theater, national, and/or multinational OBJECTIVESТАЩ (JP 3-0) [12]. According to his view, the role of the ТАШGRAND strategy - higher STRATEGYТАЩ is to coordinate and to focus all available resources of nation or of an alliance of nations on achievement of political purposes of war that are determined by fundamental policy [Liddell Hart, 1967: 322]. The biggest contradiction between ТАШGRAND STRATEGIESТАЩ and based on them practical (doctrinal) documents is contradiction between consistency of principles (political and military dogmas) and horizons of development, ability of ТАШGRAND STRATEGYТАЩ to reflect variability of policy both domestic and foreign as a response to threats and opportunities of future. Moreover, one has to deal with quite specific issues, for example, lobbying pressure from various elites - political, industrial, and military.
Список литературы
1. Т ю Ф э э р ф ю ъ В А ш э р г ъ А р Ч э ш. а Ц И х э э П а Э С Ю т Ц ф 2 т х А х Б э П 2015 А. [The Military Doctrine of Ukraine. The NSDC Decision, 2 September 2015], 2. Ъ ю э Ж х я Ж Ц П А ю ч т ш В ъ Г Б х ъ В ю А Г с х ч я х ъ ш Ц ю с ю А ю э ш г ъ А р Ч э ш. а Ц И х э э П а Э С Ю т Ц ф 4 с х А х ч э П 2016. [The Concept of the Development of Security and Defense Sector of Ukraine. The NSDC Decision, 4 March 2016], 3. б В А р В х у Ц П ъ Ц с х А с х ч я х ъ ш г ъ А р Ч э ш. а Ц И х э э П а Э С Ю т Ц ф 27 Б Ц З э П 2016 А. [The Cyber Security Strategy of Ukraine. The NSDC Decision, 27 January 2016], 4. б В А р В х у Ц П э р Ж Ц ю э р ы М э ю Ч с х ч я х ъ ш. а Ц И х э э П а Э С Ю т Ц ф 6 В А р т э П 2015 А. [The National Security Strategy of Ukraine. The NSDC Decission, 6 May 2015], 5. Public Law 99-433 99th Congress, The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, 6. The National Security Act of 1947, Washington DC, 7. US National Security Strategy 2010, 8. US National Security Strategy 2015, 9. Directives and Instructions, Defense Department Intelligence and Security Doctrine, 10. Cassidy R. M. (2003) ТАШRUSSIA in Afghanistan and Chechnya: Military Strategic Culture and the Paradoxes of Asymmetric CONFLICTТАЩ, U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute, 11. Deni J. R. (2015) Obama s failure to demilitarize U. S. foreign policy. The War on the Rocks, 30 October 2015
12. Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (2010), as amended through 15 November 2015, JP 1-02, 13. Doran G. T. (1981) ТАШTHEREТАЩS a S.M.A.R.T. way to write MANAGEMENTТАЩS goals and OBJECTIVESТАЩ, Management Review (AMA FORUM) 70 (11): 35-36.
14. Dresner D. W. (2011) ТАШDOES Obama have a great strategy?ТАЩ, Foreign Affairs July/August Issue, 15. Liddell Hart B. H. (1967) Strategy. London, UK: Faber and Faber.
16. Lobell S. (2013) ТАШENGAGING the enemy and the lessons for the Obama ADMINISTRATIONТАЩ, Political Science Quarterly 128(2): 261-287
17. MACLEAN G. A. (2006) Clinton s foreign policy in Russia: From deterrence and isolation to democratization and engagement. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Pub Co.
18. Morgenthau H., Thompson K. (1985) Politics Among Nations. New York: MCGRAW-Hill.
19. NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions (2008). Listing terms of military significance and their definitions for use in NATO: AAP-6.
20. Posen B. (2014) Restraint: A new foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21. Posen B., Ross A. (1997) ТАШCOMPETING Visions for U. S. Grand STRATEGYТАЩ, International Security 21 (3): 5-53.
22. Stokes D. (2003) ТАШWHY the end of the Cold War DOESNТАЩT matter: The US war of terror in COLOMBIAТАЩ, Review of International Studies 29: 569-585.
23. Tami D. (2015) Strategy and Grand Strategy: What students and practitioners need to know. Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 24. Thomas T. L. (1991) ТАШTHE Soviet military on Desert Storm: Redefining doctrine?, Journal of Soviet Military Studies 12: 594-620.
25. REUTERS, Hillary Clinton calls for constant engagement with Putin, 7 April 2015, <http://europe.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-calls-constant-engagement-putin- 329794?rm=eu/ а р ч ь х Й х э ю э р .ru